The reform and its new terms and conditions will be incorporated in the draft amended finance law (PLFR), which will be presented Wednesday in the Council of ministers and discussed at the end of November in Parliament, says Bercy in a statement.
the reform of The tax at source, tax measure lighthouse of the end of the quinquennium Holland, originally scheduled to enter into force in early 2018. It worries the employers, who see it as a series of new business constraints.
“The concerns raised by this project were not of principle, but practice”, writes the minister of the Action and of the public Accounts Gérald Darmanin in the press release.
According to him, the new rules will be implemented “secure”. The government had announced at the beginning of June, a postponement of the reform, the time to order a series of audits on the “robustness” of the new device and on the “charge-induced” for the collectors, especially the bosses.
A lower cost than expected for businesses
>>READ ALSO. Mps will vote on the one-year deferral of the deduction at source of income tax
These reports have confirmed that the transition to the removal at the source would have a cost for companies, but lower than expected: it should be between 310 and 420 million euros, instead of 1.2 billion euros previously mentioned.
According to paris-Bercy, more than 70% of this cost is related to the implementation of the new payroll software, training of users and the time spent to make the pedagogy from the employees. However, these costs can be mitigated with a series of simplification measures, is estimated.
The government has planned a number of changes compared to the initial project, including an easing of sanctions to the collectors in case of failure “declarative”, the minimum fine from 500 to 250 euros.
He also plans to enable collectors to recover the rate of custom of the taxpayers before the first payment of the income, to apply it immediately.
“In fact, due to the time necessary to recover the rate of personalized to a user, the collector was obliged to apply a neutral rate on the first or even the first two months of wages”, what could have been “raise questions with collectors,”, emphasizes the finance ministry.
Next, taxpayers, finally, it provides for the establishment of a single regime of penalties for the different situations under this case.